News

81
08/31/2018 10:52 AM Posted by: David Cohen Poster Avatar

Ki Tavo
Deuteronomy 26:1–29:8
When You Go Out

Featured from the URJ website from RABBI RACHEL SABATH BEIT-HALACHMI, PH.D
Relationships—even sacred relationships—are not static. While there may have been glorious moments of deep commitment and mutual love in the past, sometimes the past isn’t enough to sustain the future. Because people change, and time and life’s experiences can be challenging, every relationship must also evolve. Even the most profound covenants and commitments between us sometimes need to be renewed or reestablished. But is this true even of our relationship with God? Isn’t our covenantal commitment with God unqualified and beyond limitation? Wasn’t the covenant established with the Revelation of Torah at Mount Sinai enough?

In an attempt to summarize Moses’ final orations in the beginning of Deuteronomy, the text of this week’s Torah portion, Ki Tavo, emphasizes something very powerful about Moses’ third oration: it calls for an additional covenant to be made between the Holy One and the people of Israel. "These are the terms of the covenant which the Eternal commanded Moses to conclude with the Israelites in the land of Moab, in addition to the covenant which He had made with them at Horeb” (Deut. 28:69). On the high-stakes journey between Sinai and Jerusalem a new covenant was needed.

A new covenant? Why was a new one needed? When the covenant was made at Mount Sinai the people of Israel accepted it wholeheartedly and committed themselves to observe the Torah and its commandments, as we saw in Exodus: "Then he [Moses] took the record of the covenant and read it aloud to the people. And they said, ‘All that the Eternal has spoken we will faithfully do!’ ” (Ex. 24:7).

But the Sages of the Talmud (Shabbat 88a) recognized that the kind of covenant established initially was in a particular context. In a shocking midrashic explanation of the verse "And they took their places at the foot of the mountain” (Ex.19:17), R. Avdimi bar Hama bar Hasa made the following radical assumption about what really happened at Sinai: "This teaches that God held the mountain over their heads and said to them 'If you accept my Torah, good. If not, here will be your graves!’ ” In other words, God threatened the Israelites with death! They must accept the Torah or else they would be killed. According to this reading we entered the covenant with God under duress. If so, how can such a covenant be binding?

The coercive element in the covenant at Mount Sinai can be interpreted in various ways. Rabbeinu Tam (1100-1171), a French medieval halachic commentator, ascribes the coercion to Divine Revelation at Mount Sinai: "For it was by the Word [of God], albeit under duress.” In other words, direct Revelation of God created a situation in which there was no free choice, for who can refuse the direct word of God? (see the Tosafot on the same passage). But still, a two-fold problem remains: did the Israelites voluntarily accept the covenant and, if not, is it binding?

Other Sages of the Talmud recognize the deep theological problem Avdimi bar Hama had suggested, and Rav Aha bar Yaakov responds: "Thus we learn an important thing about the Torah.” That important thing, say other commentators, is the warning about the necessity and power of Torah, and our covenant with God. Some scholars, like the modern French Jewish Philosopher Emmanuel Levinas (1906-1995) teach that, in fact, choosing Torah and entering into the covenant is the choice between life and death. A covenant with God affirms life in juxtaposition to the death and suffering of Egypt, and the death-worshipping of other cultures. Our covenant with God and, in fact, Judaism as a whole, is ultimately about choosing life.

Yet the problem of whether or not the Israelites actually voluntarily accepted the covenant with God still shouts out from the Talmud passage. Did we really accept the covenant voluntarily or if we entered into the covenantal relationship with God at Sinai under duress is the covenant really binding? The next line of the Talmudic text, however, is perhaps the most important: ‘’Said Rava, ‘Nevertheless [it is binding] for they accepted it again in the days of Ahasuereus, as it is written "The Jews upheld that which had been accepted,” (Esther 9:27) they agreed to uphold that which they had already accepted.’ ”

Relying on a new proof text to confirm that in fact we did accept the covenant voluntarily and that, yes, it still claims us, Rava—a later Babylonian Sage—presents an even more compelling argument about the covenant. Yes, we did and do accept the covenant voluntarily, but we did so hundreds of years after Sinai in a very different context. Only after generations of living with Torah could the covenant be fully embraced. In each generation we must understand the covenant anew and embrace it in new ways.

Long before the Book of Esther or the Sages of the Babylonian Talmud who come together to respond to these questions with the benefit of great historical distance, the Deuteronomist already knew that the covenant between the Israelites and God established at Mount Sinai needed to be reframed. This is precisely the predicament of the Israelites in Parashat Ki Tavo.

As the Israelites are straddled between two mountains on their way to a new reality, Moses advises them to rethink the covenant. The covenant delivered on the plains of Moab created what can be described as the establishment of mutual accountability within the Jewish people.

This mutual accountability requires that we are mindful of each other. We are not just a collection of individuals; our future also depends upon our capacity to live as a community, a well-formed collective entity. The Israelites became a people in the full sense of the word only after the covenant on the plains of Moab: "To enter into the covenant of the Eternal your God, which the Eternal your God is concluding with you this day, with its sanctions: in order to establish you this day as God’s people and in order to be your God, as promised you ... ” (Deut. 29:11-12).

While our sense of peoplehood began once we left Egypt and was declared at Mount Sinai, only upon entering the Land was it clear to the people themselves that their future depends upon mutual commitment. We become a people who are able to live out the possibilities of covenant only when we understand collectively and are committed together to whatever the future might demand.

When there is so much at stake on the journey toward the future, the opportunity to pause and renew our commitments not only to God, but also to each other can be the difference between floundering and flourishing. All commitments—all covenants—are regularly in need of reexamination. And in order to embrace the future together it is quite possible that the covenants of the past will not be enough.

Especially at this time of the year, and in this age of Reform Judaism, we too need to renew our commitments and our understanding of covenant and mutual responsibility. What claims us now, and why? Is there any limit to our proud autonomy that also allows simultaneously for some authority of the tradition? Ultimately and especially in this moment our mutual commitment both to each other and to our broader sense of Jewish peoplehood will be powerful sources for the covenants we need in order to thrive in the future.

Categorized under:  Torah

80
08/24/2018 12:04 PM Posted by: David Cohen Poster Avatar
Ki Teitzei
Deuteronomy 21:10–25:19
When You Go Out

Preparing for a new year and a new you:

This week’s Parashah, by examining codes of laws and regulations, presents a set of ethical and moral dilemmas.  One could group them into three areas:
1How ethics uphold our society.
2How the concern for others is a universal concept we need in our world.
3The importance of our concern for the natural world.

As we begin a new school year, and the month of Elul leads us into the High Holidays, it is a perfect time to speak to our students about how these themes come together at this time of year.

In the beginning of a school year, we are trying to establish norms and routines.  But we are also creating community and asking our students to focus on kindness, respect, welcoming, and self-control.  And the purpose need not be just about keeping order.  We may be creating a contract of behavior in our rooms – a Brit – so that learning can take place.  But we can also acknowledge that these are universal values that Judaism provides us as ways to improve society as a whole – and by extension the world.

Elul is about taking stock of some of these values that we will then reflect further upon during Rosh Hashannah and Yom Kippur.  Yes, we are hopeful for a sweet new year ahead and will celebrate that with our food and our prayer.  But we can only bring about the full sweetness of a new year when we have made changes in ourselves and the world.
In speaking with our students about this, I asked what would happen if the world never changed?  Their reactions were impressive.  They know the world needs to change and they began to realize that changes in themselves, in their own behavior, is what starts that process.

Students at the younger ages may not see that connection, but the fact that this is the time of year we focus on these new starts, on creating community, and on being the most welcoming and most compassionate person we can is a connection to our tradition we can make every year at this time.

Categorized under:  Torah

Blog Search

Categories

1Elementary Education
Elementary Education (43)
2Preschool
Preschool (36)
3Torah
Torah (31)

Archives

201811November1
November 2018 (1)
201810October4
October 2018 (4)
201809September4
September 2018 (4)
201808August2
August 2018 (2)
201805May4
May 2018 (4)
201804April4
April 2018 (4)
201803March4
March 2018 (4)
201802February4
February 2018 (4)
201801January3
January 2018 (3)
201712December3
December 2017 (3)
201704April1
April 2017 (1)
201703March1
March 2017 (1)
201702February2
February 2017 (2)
201701January1
January 2017 (1)
201604April1
April 2016 (1)
201505May1
May 2015 (1)
201503March1
March 2015 (1)
201502February1
February 2015 (1)
201501January1
January 2015 (1)
201412December2
December 2014 (2)
201409September1
September 2014 (1)
201408August1
August 2014 (1)
201405May2
May 2014 (2)
201312December1
December 2013 (1)
201310October3
October 2013 (3)
201308August1
August 2013 (1)
201305May3
May 2013 (3)
201304April4
April 2013 (4)
201303March10
March 2013 (10)
201212December1
December 2012 (1)
201210October1
October 2012 (1)
201209September2
September 2012 (2)
201109September1
September 2011 (1)
201103March1
March 2011 (1)
201101January1
January 2011 (1)
201012December1
December 2010 (1)
201011November1
November 2010 (1)
201010October2
October 2010 (2)
201009September2
September 2010 (2)
201008August2
August 2010 (2)
201007July1
July 2010 (1)